Larouche was actually at the beginning of a scheduled interview when the 2nd plane hit the WTCs,
click here for the transcript which i will quote from
Stockwell (host): But now, with what has just happened in New York, with this--you know, interesting enough. Just yesterday, I received--I think it was just yesterday -- a bundle of leaflets from your organization in Leesburg that I regularly pass out in my office warning of terrorst attacks in America here very shortly.
.....
LaRouche: Yes. We have a global process. Look, the financial system's coming down. That's always a dangerous thing. Because when the entire system is being shaken up the way it is now, by the financial collapse, political things happen, because various people try to intervene and orchestrate events by spectacular interventions, which will change, shall we say, get public attention off one thing and put it on another.
So, this is obviously--I mean, I cannot draw a conclusion, except the circumstances tell me something rather evil is behind this thing. And I don't know which, but they're both connected, because I know the Goldsmith brothers--for example, Jimmy Goldsmith was key in helping to create--he's now deceased--Osama bin Laden and people like that. The Taliban and so forth.
from wiki:
LaRouche: Sure. There are many. Osama bin Laden is a controlled entity. Osama bin Laden is not an independent force. Remember how he came into existence. Osama bin Laden was a wealthy sultan. Back in the 1970s, during the Carter Administration, or shall we say the Brzezinski Administration, the idea of running an Afghanistan war on the borders of Soviet territory was cooked up by Brzezinski as a geopolitical operation.
Well, Brzezinski was responsible. They didn't necessarily cook it up. But all right. This thing started, and an Anglo-American unit, running together with a certain section of the Pakistani military, the funny, funny boys in the Pakistani military, set up this operation.
...So this thing is left behind. And suddenly now we find Osama bin Laden becomes the name. And Osama bin Laden could not last, the way he's running around, if he didn't have big protection.
this is all from the hip, as the story is unravelling... pretty impressive
...But some story like that. But what we're into is a period where the word is not terrorism. Terrorism is a part of the picture. The word is ``destabilization.'' The problem part, from my standpoint, is, look at our own government.
.....LaRouche: The question is, where were the relevant intelligence agencies which are in charge of monitoring this problem? Now, I've been putting this out for some time--not this, I didn't know this airplane thing, but I assumed almost anything could happen... but on the Washington, D.C. targetting. So obviously, the Pentagon means that this is obviously, clearly Washington, D.C. targettting. This is obviously intended to imply something coming out of the Middle East. This means that there's been some kind of either incompetence or fix on the whole security operation, because you CAN'T get this kind of thing without a real goofup, on the security side. So somebody in charge of security was really not very effectively in charge.
You can't go around snatching planes in a coordinated fashion, like this. You can't do it. Somebody has to be really sloppy.
LaRouche: Some people would like to think that if you convince the American people that Pearl Harbor has been bombed again, that you can use that effect, which I saw on the streets on Sunday, that famous Sunday, Dec. 7, 1941, you can use that event to mobilize the American people, particularly under the conditions of present denial and hysteria about the economy, and so forth, they can do something and mobilize the United States in a foolish direction. This would drive the world berserk. To think that you have lunatics in the United States, who would even threaten to go to world war over a thing like this.
LaRouche: Somebody wants this thing to go out of control. That's why they're doing this. This is not an attack; this is a {provocation.} It's a provocation with an intention behind it. To create a programmed reaction from the institutions of the United States. This is not some dumb guy with a turban some place in the world, trying to get revenge for what's going on in the Middle East. This is something different.
the Arabs don't have the ability to pull something of this level off. You feel pretty strongly about that?
LaRouche: I know that. I know the Arab governments. I've been talking to them directly or indirectly over some period. At least, the key ones. And they don't want this kind of thing. But I know who does want it.
Stockwell: All right. Now, you were talking about possibly the idea of the Israeli government --
LaRouche: Or certain factions within it.
Stockwell: Certain factions within it. Just like there are certain factions within the Pentagon that would love for us to go to war in the Middle East.
LaRouche: Same thing. Exactly. Like Wolfowitz, for example. I don't think the world is safe with someone like him in the Defense Department, frankly.
interview sept 12/2001
LAROUCHE: So, we had this discussion, and I must say, that looking back on it, a little more than a day later, that I didn't say anything wrong, I didn't get anything wrong. I was taken by surprise, in a sense, but not surprised by the fact of this, nor was I surprised by the fact that it was primarily a domestic, covert, special operation, by people with very high-grade military special-operations backgrounds. It could not have happened otherwise.
LAROUCHE: To create a simulated Pearl Harbor effect to get the United States to go to war against nations in the Middle East.
ANNOUNCER: So, you're not buying the conventional wisdom here, as to this being Osama bin Laden, or anyone else?
LAROUCHE: I doubt that there's any wisdom behind the people who think so. I think the point is, anybody who understands -- Look, there were certain features of these developments yesterday, which immediately attracted all of our attention. I had over the, since then, since yesterday morning, I've been reaching out to old, high-level military and intelligence people around the world, including Russia, as well as Western Europe and elsewhere, and we put together, from the U.S. side, and from these areas, a very good cross-check picture of what happened. It could not happen -- Look, the United States could not have done that to the Soviet Union during the high point of the conflict of the Cold War. We didn't have the capability to do to the Soviet Union {then}, what was done to us yesterday.
the Larouche movement has a very sophisticated intelligence aparatus that can investigate things properly and thoroughly. recently, they produced some new evidence pointing to Saudi Intelligence (prince Bandahr) being largely involved as well as BAE.
this stuff could, and should be used to get some convictions
